Globalization. It’s the buzzword of a generation, but what does the term really mean? Ask a Chinese
economist, a South African cinematographer, an American cultural anthropologist, and a Mexican migrant
worker, and each is likely to give a different definition.

These many interpretations of a single concept inform the essay collection Global Babel: Questions of Discourse and Communication in a Time of Globalization (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007). The book is coedited by Associate Professor of English Samir Dayal. His project partner, Margueritte Murphy, has since left the Bentley English Department to serve as associate provost at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.

Undermining Meaning

Dayal and Murphy’s idea for Global Babel grew from a sense that there are at least as many ways to conceptualize globalization as there are academic disciplines and specialists.

The more the word “globalization”
gains currency, the less clear its
meaning becomes.

“We thought we could do a useful service by bringing together voices from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds,” explains Dayal, noting that he does not consider himself an expert on globalization per se.

The term “globalization” generally refers to the intensification of international trade, communication, and cultural contact that dates from the early to mid-1990s. It is closely tied to advances in information technology, including the Internet and social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. The more the word gains currency, observe Dayal and Murphy, the less clear its meaning becomes.

“As with the Biblical Babel, there is not a single ‘language’ of globalization,” says Murphy. “Here we mean not just language in the ordinary sense, but ways of talking about globalization, ways of describing what it is.”

The Good, the Bad, the Global Historically, discussions of the topic inspire heated debate. Globalization is bad! (Remember the anti-globalization protests at the 1999 World Trade Organization Conference in Seattle?) Globalization is

good! (Consider the immediate outpouring of worldwide aid for victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.) Either way, says Murphy, a black-or-white approach misses the point and undermines the discourse.

“We understand, talk about, and frame the issues of globalization depending on who we are,” she explains. “Our place in the nexus of relationships that is globalization — as a migrant worker, a member of a local nongovernmental organization, an employee in a sweatshop that produces goods for the American market, an official at the International Monetary Fund — affects our understanding of what precisely globalization is.”

Crossing Boundaries

Dayal and Murphy’s collaboration emerged from an English Department retreat in 2002, when the idea of working across academic specialties got them thinking. From the beginning, both editors were determined to enlist authors from a variety of disciplines, from around the world.

Dan Courter

The essays were penned by leading theorists, scholars and experts in the United States and abroad. Topics include Irish film in a global economy, feminist activism in post-Communist Poland, and global journalism and travel writing. Authors include several Bentley scholars, among them, Provost Bob Galliers, Professor of Marketing Raj Sisodia, and Dayal himself. A student, Ryan Dwyer ’09, contributed research as part of an independent study project.

Professor Samir Dayal

“Globalization touches everybody’s life and affects almost every aspect of everyday life,” says Dayal, who discusses the book in a video interview at www.bentley.edu/faculty-research/conversations/ murphy-dayal.cfm. “But there are many questions about its effects and its future that still, or increasingly, require analysis.”

In marshaling divergent opinions on and definitions of the concept, Global Babel starts the conversation. Tracey Palmer

11
OBSERVER